Skip to content

导论

一、天地张力之间

2026 年 1 月 6 日,位于成都的秋雨圣约教会1再度遭到国家机构的联手打压,多位教会领袖与成员被拘留或失联。这一情景令人回想起该教会 2018 年的分水岭时刻。那年王怡牧师因「煽动颠覆国家政权罪」被判处九年有期徒刑。这些反复出现的对峙,其核心乃在于该教会坚持走公开化的道路。这场基督徒运动正承受着数百年来始终困扰基督徒见证的矛盾困境。G.K.切斯特顿曾生动描绘这一困境:

他们努力在第一章给我证明基督教是太过悲观(叫我拍案叫绝),然后在第二章试图向我证明基督教极其过分乐观。一方面,基督教被指控阻止人借忧郁的眼泪和惊恐,从大自然的怀抱中寻找快乐和自由。另一方面,基督教又被指控以虚假的天意与人慰藉,把人置放在粉白色的托儿所中。2

这里浮现的是一个由对基督教的不同批评所产生的矛盾困境:一方面,它被指责过于悲观,另一方面又被抨击为过于乐观。因此,在批评者眼中,基督教这一信仰既过于超脱尘世、退出世界,又过于安逸,与世界妥协。对于那些坚持其信仰的公开性,却拒绝将其简化为任何世俗道德议程的基督徒来说,这是一个持续存在的挑战。一些神学家提出若干著名的神学理论,以厘清「救赎国度」与「地上国度」之间复杂而悖论性的关系。奥古斯丁《上帝之城》中的「两城论」3,以及马丁·路德在宗教改革时期阐述的「两国论」(the doctrine of the two)4,无疑是其中最具影响力的理论。然而,这些理论本身并非定论;它们开启了一个诠释空间,并由此引发了更为精深微妙的理论张力。5

本论文考察的对象,是中国家庭教会牧师王怡及其位于成都的秋雨圣约教会的「信仰上的抗命」(faithful disobedience),并探讨他们如何在「退出」与「进入」之间的张力中寻找出路。王怡兼具法律政治公知与家庭教会牧师双重背景,他的例子对基督徒政治神学具有特别启发意义。在 2005 年信主、2008 年全职事奉之前,王怡作为维权律师与自由派公知,早已在中国享有相当的声誉。中国家庭教会运动长期以来持守着分离主义、私密化、与地下教会的传统。在牧养一间家庭教会、持守家庭教会群体身份的同时,王怡却拒绝退入地下。相反,他引用《申命记》六章九节,以「将神的话语写在城门上」6为口号,投身于当时城市家庭教会正在涌现的公开化使命。该使命倡导宗教活动应当完全公开进行,并寻求以独立宗教团体的身份获得合法地位,拒绝接受国家登记的三自爱国教会对其意识形态纯正性的监管。

王怡最初将自己对教会公开化的看法,与其归信前的自由保守政治理想紧密交织地呈现出来。在这一早期阶段,他的归信带有六四之后知识分子的印记。这群知识分子寻求把 1989 年破碎的民主希望,重新锚定在一个能够承载自由主义对权利、法治与公共理性诉求的宗教框架之中。基督教因此较少表现为对其先前政治承诺的断裂,反倒像是一种属灵根基,使那些政治承诺得以重新被稳固。正是在这种条件下,那困扰着天国历程之恒常两难再度浮现。退出与介入之间的张力,如今以一个具体挑战的形式呈现:那名为「公开化」的纽带,能否真正把中国家庭教会的殉道传统与六四后维权活动中所承袭的自由主义公民权议程绑系在一起?

正如本论文所要表明的,至少在2018年王怡被捕入狱之前,其思想发展始终贯穿着与这一张力的博弈。为了公正地诠释王怡思想中的张力与动态,本论文采用后自由派神学所提出的文化—语言诠释进路。这一进路既不将他的思想视为一套命题体系,也不将其理解为某种人类普遍本性的表达,而是将其视为一条主要由教会群体敬拜实践所引导的思想轨迹。本文将揭示:王怡从保守自由主义公知转型到家庭教会牧师这一历程,对理解其公共参与策略至关重要。本文主张,王怡的归信与职业转型,最终意味着他与早期自由主义意识形态立场的彻底决裂。这一决裂,本质上源于他对传统家庭教会殉道传统的强调,以及他对多元神学资源的吸收——包括但不限于重洗派和路德宗神学——这最终引领他超越了在中国家庭教会基督徒中占主导地位的新加尔文主义神学。这一诠释进路将为理解王怡和秋雨圣约教会、乃至其他中国家庭教会为信仰而抗命的政治神学意义,开辟新的视野。首先,它有助于突破当前主导王怡神学学术研究的凯波尔派框架。其次,借助侯活士的基督教末世性末世论和教会论,重新定位王怡的神学异象,从而揭示敬拜群体生命所具有的深刻批判力量。这种力量不仅指向中国的极权政权,也指向那种广泛主导当代公民哲学话语、为其设定语法规则的自由主义政治想象。最后,本论文论证,深刻影响王怡的路德宗神学资源,使他的公共神学得以在对自由主义政治保持深刻批判的同时,比华语圈的侯活士主义者更有力地肯定对真正公民社会的追求。

归根结底,本论文寻求穿透王怡不同时期思想资源所织就的复杂网络,从而揭示王怡和秋雨圣约教会为信仰而抗命实践背后的深刻批判力量。这种批判力量不只是针对中国共产主义极权政权——这一点已得到广泛认识——更根本的是,它挑战了「西化(或美国化)或中国化」这一经常框定当代汉语神学话语的预设二元对立。在本论文所识别的神学根源背景下,王怡和秋雨圣约教会的公共实践,将被揭示为一种探索性、原创性的神学辨察操练。在以福音、敬拜和殉道为中心的生命形态引导下,他们以路德神学回应逼迫处境的抵抗立场,与朋霍费尔的见证有着相当多共同关心的问题。

这种神学性抵抗与传统批判理论的不同之处在于:其批判能力从从根本上质疑所有基于人性本质或能力的解放事业,以及那些假借上帝之名为此类本质或能力背书的尝试。换言之,它甚至延伸至怀疑人之「可疑能动性」(suspicious agency)的可能性本身。同时,路德神学中固有的元素,如「隐藏性」与「单纯性」的概念,又引导这些甘愿拥抱破碎自我身份的门徒,重返公共广场,为邻舍的权利发声。在同样的公民社会与权利倡议之下,其概念支点不再是自由派的信念,而是十字架的道路,即门徒甘愿在跟随基督中舍弃生命。

「汉语神学」(Sino-theology)一词,从最广义的范围而言,可涵盖一切以中文写成的基督教神学表达。本论文只能在如此宽泛的意义上被视为对「汉语神学」或「中国神学」的研究。在中国学界,已涌现一种特定而较窄义的用法,并已围绕之形成一个相当规模的学术群体。该用法刻意将「汉语神学」与「中国神学」相区别,将后者界定为:一种在现代中国之殖民经验背景下、预设基督教为「外来」与「异质」宗教的进路。「中国神学」因而带有显著的民族主义关切,其根本前提乃「处境化」(contextualisation)的议程,要求外来的基督信仰必须与儒、释、道等中国文化相调适。而狭义的「汉语神学」学者们——以二十世纪晚期「文化基督徒」之代表人物刘小枫为首——则对此一处境化议程持批评态度。他们力图通过自我区别于「中国化」的「中国神学」,达成神学上的「范式转换」。7他们之所以如此,意在使华语圈的基督教神学研究摆脱民族主义的桎梏;不再以传统的中-西二元对立为前提,而把神学焦点放在「个体信仰之存在主义」上,强调「福音与人原初存在经验」之间的关联。刘与其追随者将此一转向称为「现代性问题域」(problematic of modernity)的转向。8

本论文使用「汉语神学」一词时,乃专指上述特定的汉语神学学者。这并非对一种处境化中国神学之必要性的肯定,而仅是用以标示一切以中文进行的神学话语,或以中文神学为研究对象之研究。也只有在如此最宽泛的意义上,本论文才可被视为一项汉语神学研究。然而,我们也将看到:在这一更宽广的汉语神学学界内部,始终存在一种普遍压力,要求探讨中国教会的基督教神学必须「中国化」(sinicisation)。王怡的进路与狭义的汉语神学学者有所重叠,皆有意识地抵抗此种压力。然而需注意:无论是「处境化」抑或「个体存在性问题」,都不足以充分把握王怡神学的核心特征。如本论文将要论证的,王怡思想历程的焦点9在于一种可信赖、可托付的语言之可能性。这一探索引领他通过路德宗神学资源,最终走向了一条与朋霍费尔「非宗教的基督教」(religionless Christianity)高度重合的道路。他拒绝将上帝视作有求必应的上帝(Deus ex machina),好像是一种只在人类陷入哲学或价值困境时,才被召唤出来解决问题的工具。相反,他甘愿以一个破碎化的自我去与神相遇。神的临在不是回答存在问题,而是使存在问题消解。这使得他的神学追寻成为一种与上述「汉语神学」与「中国神学」都迥然不同的另类范式。

此外,本论文还将澄清:拒绝处境化神学,并不意味着王怡退回到美国自由主义意识形态的老路。恰恰相反,即便没有明确地针锋相对,王怡更为成熟的神学已经与他昔日的保守派盟友有了显著的分歧。这一观察驳斥了学界广泛流传的一种指控——即认为这些城市家庭教会领袖最终不过是想在中国的土地上建造一座"美国版的山上之城"10——从而也为他们洗清了殖民主义或西方文化沙文主义的罪名。

二、研究现状述评

英语学界关于王怡的研究成果已积累相当之量,尽管这些研究内容颇为广泛甚至略显庞杂。葛维兰(Gerda Wielander)是该研究领域的开创者,她开启了这一研究课题,并激起了学术界的兴趣。自 2009 年起,她陆续发表了数篇论文,考察中国城市基督徒知识分子对中国民主化运动的影响。11其 2013 年所著《基督教价值观在共产中国》(Christian Values in Communist China )12,可视为她这些阶段性研究成果的集大成之作。她的研究影响深远,她以六四之后知识分子的维权运动与新加尔文主义之融合为基础,建立了诠释框架来理解王怡及其他城市家庭教会的公共神学。后续研究虽偶尔对王怡话语中其他宗派的神学元素提供了富有洞见的参照,却始终未能有效挑战她所建立、用于框定王怡毕生工作之分析框架的主导地位。13

遗憾的是,第一部考察王怡与秋雨圣约教会的学术专著却命运多舛。14尽管作者马丽自述该书力图整合「社会理论、组织行为学研究与神学分析」,并以平衡的资料来源对秋雨圣约教会所经历的性伦理事件与教会分裂进行客观且跨学科的研究,15然而自出版以来,该书的学术诚信便备受质疑。批评意见指出,书中存在大量学术格式不规范、资料来源偏颇、采访材料被篡改、断章取义以及强行解读等问题。16鉴于该书存在的学术伦理问题,本论文暂不将其作为主要参考依据,仅指出它是第一本专门研究王怡的英文专著,留待日后进一步审视。

与上述主流研究框架不同,本论文论证:王怡后期思想所汲取的神学与政治资源远不止加尔文主义,他更整合了社群主义政治哲学的元素,以及殉道神学、后自由主义神学与路德神学等神学传统资源。172022 年,《信仰上的抗命:来自中国家庭教会的政教关系文集》(Faithful Disobedience: Writings on Church and State from a Chinese House Church)出版,18为王怡及其他参与中国家庭教会公开化的牧者的大量文章、讲座与反思提供了英译本。此前,学界重点关注的是王怡早期的宪政主义著作,以及后来通过凯波尔主义范畴重新表述的论点。相比之下,《信仰上的抗命》揭示了更深层的神学资源;它们不仅拓宽了阐释视域,更对最初用凯波尔主义的框架来诠释王怡的政治抵抗构成了显著压力,并在关键维度上实现了超越。这些文献为英语人士提供了此前鲜为人知的资料,可以更全面地诠释王怡与秋雨圣约教会的公共实践。然而,尽管有了这些资源,现有研究仍极少对其神学意义给予持续关注,而是继续依赖于既有的自由主义或新加尔文主义框架。本论文的一个核心目标便是填补这一学术空白。

三、论证概览

本研究可用于王怡之资料主要分为四类。第一类是王怡本人的著作。自 21 世纪初至 2018 年入狱前,他所发表的作品体裁十分广泛:诗歌、政论、影评、神学论文、牧函、证道与灵修等等。值得注意的是,王怡的著作,尤其是他成为牧师之后的作品,几乎从不采用严格的学术格式。这一方面源于其作品的体裁多样性,另一方面也反映了中国右翼19公共知识分子普遍流行的写作倾向。其一,由于学术界中无所不在的政治压力与审查制度,刘晓波与王怡等右翼知识分子倾向于绕过正式的学术渠道,更多依赖非正式的公共舆论场域,尤其是 21 世纪初兴起的网络论坛。20其二,规范学术的语言与形式要求,这些政治异见者常视之为中国文化与意识形态问题的结晶;抵抗这些规范被视作其政治抵抗不可分割的一部分。21中国公共话语的此一情境特征,为研究者追溯思想之源造成困难。本论文虽无法保证其概念谱系工作的完全确凿,但仍将力求通过多元途径——包括对写作时段、专门用语、概念重叠以及他者描述的考察——尽其所能地辨识王怡思想的上游来源。

第二类资源是关于王怡神学思想的二手研究。他从2005年到大约2010年代初期的文章和讲座,已经引起了学界的关注,并推动形成了前文所提及的学术诠释框架——将新加尔文主义基督教世界观与他归信前的保守宪政主义哲学的整合,视为王怡理论的核心主题。

第三类资源涵盖中国哲学与政治理论,主要但不仅限于儒家经典及其当代诠释与应用。深入研究这些材料,从根本上是为了清晰地勾勒出儒家士大夫传统的面貌。唯有以此为参照,才能凸显出王怡的抵抗行为所具有的激进性质。在当代处境中,这类研究对于揭示中国当前大外宣所输出的「天下」世界观,与传统天朝意识形态及帝王崇拜之间的深厚亲缘关系尤具重大意义。这有助于厘清,在当代地缘政治景观中,家庭教会信仰上的抗命具有何种政治意涵。

最后一类资源来自西方神学学术研究。如前所述,本论文并不将自己定义为常规意义上的汉语神学研究。这里所采用的后自由派神学进路,使它得以为东方的秋雨圣约教会与西方的宗教改革神学、侯活士的重洗派神学和认信教会路德宗神学之间的语言共同基础进行辩护。这种共同基础所维系的亲缘关系,远远超过所谓处境化的中国哲学文化资源,甚至也超过那种常被视为塑造了王怡政治抱负的西方自由主义法律政治哲学。

当然,这并不意味着本地化元素可以被忽视。然而,正如使徒行传对五旬节的记载,当圣灵降临时,福音以多元的文化语言被表达出来——其决定性意义,在于门徒领受了「如火焰的舌头」(使徒行传 2:3),一种超越不同语言体系之间不可通约性( incommensurability)的共同语法基础。这一现象在当代哲学中已被广泛认识,有时甚至被视为对多元社会中和解事业的威胁。22从这一视角来看,援引西方资源来阐明王怡公共神学的根本语法,可以带来超越文化人类学范围的神学洞见。它揭示了在东西方哲学和政治意识形态的拉锯战中,王怡和秋雨圣约教会如何建立、或至少试图建立一种替代性模式。这一模式旨在于张力之中,借着在敬拜中被更新的眼光,观察天父在他的世界中所成就的新事;并以被打开的耳朵,聆听受造界回应那日夜看顾它的主的奇妙交响。带着这种确信,以殉道为导向的基督徒得以重返世界,在一个四分五裂的社会中,重建公民生活的根基。

本论文在结构上分为七章。第一章勾勒王怡的生平背景,指出1989年天安门广场大屠杀对维权知识分子造成的集体创伤,是王怡思想历程中最重要的方向性驱动力。本章揭示,这场大屠杀所留下的精神荒原,如何引领一批六四后知识分子将社会改革的本质,理解为精神与宗教价值的重建。通过刘晓波对六四运动的回忆,本章展示了六四后活动人士中如何涌现出对民族主义和儒家士大夫传统遗产更为深刻、更为激进的反思。在「全盘西化」这一路标的引导下,这条思想轨迹催生了对基督教的兴趣。值得注意的是,这场精神追寻,主要是通过审美理论、尤其是诗学来展开的。在这里,自由首先被呈现为一个语言哲学问题:如何发现一种新语言,从中国历史上一直被用来维护社会秩序与和谐的传统审美感受力中挣脱出来,成为这些政治异见人士的核心关怀。

第二章批判性地审视王怡的宪政话语,揭示王怡早期保守主义法律政治理论中的模糊性与内在矛盾。这些问题折射出六四后知识分子精神世界中弥漫的价值真空。得益于王怡归信后对这一时期写作的反思,我们回顾过去就可看出,诗人王怡那虚无主义式的戏谑与宪政学者王怡对人类传统毫无保留的赞美之间,存在着强烈的违和感与不真实性。王怡戏剧性地归信基督教,使他与长久以来所寻求的超越者相遇,踏上了一段漫长的学习基督教新语言的历程。起初,城市家庭教会所熟悉的新加尔文主义基督教世界观概念,帮助王怡迅速弥合了他的洛克式保守主义与信仰之间的鸿沟。然而,其中隐含的模糊性,已然预示了这种连接的脆弱性及其未来的修正。

第三章首先回顾了王怡进入全职事奉的历史背景,当时正值城市家庭教会公开化运动兴起。在概述了公开化运动在法律登记和建堂等方面的实践重点后,本章援引二手研究,重点分析了参与该运动的福音派家庭教会所面临的双重批判。这些两极化的批评,反映了城市家庭教会在崛起过程中所面临的身份张力。作为公开化运动的领袖,王怡与刘同苏将殉道视为与倾向分离主义的传统家庭教会之间的共同根基,并坚持二者之间的连续性。然而,然而,这却在他们信仰实践的公共意义诠释上引发了混乱。有学者担忧,这些异见人士将教会拉得离世俗政治太近,使基督见证面临沦为自由主义政治议程的风险;另一些学者则指出,对早期家庭教会传统的坚持,使他们过度脱离了中国的文化和社会语境,阻碍了基督教处境化的事业。然而,这两种批判路径最终都汇聚于对信仰「美国化」的担忧。

第四章首先审视几篇西方学者从凯波尔主义视角为王怡神学辩护的分析。然而,这些辩护者对中国化议程的不同态度,也揭示了他们之间的内在张力。本章论证,这种张力从根本上源于亚伯拉罕·凯波尔理论本身在神学命题主义( theological propositionalism)与经验—表达主义(experiential-expressionism)之间的内在含混。这种含混不仅可能瓦解秋雨圣约教会反基督教中国化实践的理论基础,也掩盖了这些实践所依托的教会论和末世论原有的社会批判力量。本章最后对英语学界的王怡神学研究作了谱系性梳理,揭示主导性的凯波尔主义诠释框架如何忽视了王怡思想历程中几个关键的转折点——包括他后来对洛克自由主义的批判性参与、他对殉道神学的接纳,以及促使他对加尔文主义神学进行批判性反思的路德宗神学资源。

第五章开始建构另一套替代性诠释框架来解读王怡一生的工作。本章引入后自由派神学的文化—语言进路,并揭示其在王怡晚期神学著作中的存在。鉴于中国现代教会史上保守福音派家庭教会与自由普世主义三自教会之间长期的阵营对垒,主要源于普世主义关怀的后自由派神学,似乎与王怡的家庭教会身份格格不入。然而,本章另辟蹊径,先借乔治·林贝克(George Lindbeck)与侯活士之间的神学传承与转化,论证了后自由主义神学如何早已超越了其最初的合一目标,转而拥抱以具体地方性为中心的大公性。其次,展示王怡后期将信仰理解为一种生命形态的追求,如何与后自由派神学对命题主义和表现主义的文化—语言批判产生共鸣。最后,本章从后自由派文化—语言视角出发,审视一个以与新儒家哲学展开宗教间对话为核心的具体凯波尔主义基督教中国化方案。通过追踪这一方案的神学含义,本章指出:这种主要聚焦于学术交流和概念汇聚的中国化策略,低估了基督教群体实践(尤其是敬拜和圣礼)的塑造作用,因而依赖于一种过于理想化的宗教间和解观,忽略了不同语法与实践之间那些不可通约的差异

第六章处理王怡公共神学与侯活士主义之间的张力。本章借助港式侯派在占领中环运动期间对公民运动的神学批评,揭示了现代公民社会概念与强调基督教群体本身就是公共、因而是另类城邦的教会论之间潜在的冲突。为了调和王怡思想中并存的这两个关键元素,本章援引朋霍费尔的路德宗神学,探讨基督教「可见性」与「隐藏性」这两个看似矛盾的概念。本章部分赞同乔纳森·马莱西克(Jonathan Malesic)的批评,即侯活士对朋霍费尔见证的诠释,或许未能充分认识到后者关于基督徒隐藏性的教导。然而,通过对朋霍费尔文本的深入分析,本章也论证马勒西克错误地预设了「隐藏性vs可见性(或公开性)」的严格二元对立。本章援引当代路德宗神学的视角,提出「隐藏的公开化」(publicisation as hiddenness)这一概念,来诠释城市家庭教会公共实践的神学意义。这不仅重新为教会走向公民社会开辟了道路,也深化了其批判能力,使之能够介入对深刻形塑当代公民哲学话语之自我身份议题的反思。

第七章以王怡的教育理论为例,揭示他所援用的两国论或两城论神学框架的局限。继而提出,路德的三个产业(three estates)教义如何能够更好地为家庭教会的公共关怀提供神学支撑,同时保持上帝国度与世界之间的末世性张力。这种修正后的教会公共性论述,为王怡的神学整合提供了潜在的宝贵资源。最后,本章以对全文的综合性回顾作结,概述所呈现的诠释进路的突破之处、重要意义、内在局限与未来前景。

Footnotes

  1. The Early Rain Covenant Church evolved from the Early Rain Blessing Church, which began in the Wang's home in 2005. When the church was formally established in 2008, its official name was set as Early Rain Blessing Church. In 2017, due to internal disputes, some members, elders, and pastors separated under the name of establishing a new congregation, founding the Early Rain Baihua Church. The congregation continuing to be led by Pastor Wang was renamed Early Rain Covenant Church in 2018. This thesis adopts the current name ERCC to refer to the church led by Wang throughout his pastrol career.

  2. G.K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy (New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1943), 156. accommodated to it. This is a challenge that has persistently confronted Christians who insist on the public nature of their faith yet refuse to reduce it to any worldly moral agenda. Several famous theological theories have been developed to give more clarity to the complex and paradoxical relationship between the kingdom of salvation and the earthly kingdom. Augustine's two-city theory in The City of God3 and Martin Luther's "the doctrine of the two"4 articulated during the Reformation, are arguably the most influential of such theories. These theories are not themselves definitive conclusions; they open an interpretative space which often gives rise to much more refined and subtle theoretical tensions.5 This thesis examines the faithful disobedience of the Chinese house-church pastor Wang Yi and the Early Rain Covenant Church in Chengdu and how they navigated this tension between withdrawal and engagement. Wang's dual background as both a legal and political public intellectual and a house-church pastor makes his case especially instructive for Christian political theology. Wang had already gained widespread recognition in China as a civil rights lawyer and liberal public intellectual when he converted to Christianity in 2005 and then became a full-time pastor in 2008. He became a pastor in a house church movement that had long focused on representing a separatist, privatised, and underground tradition. While upholding the communal identity of house churches, Wang resisted this retreat into seclusion. Instead, under the slogan "writing God's words upon the city gates"6 —an allusion to

  3. See De civ. Dei 19.

  4. Martin Luther's doctrine of the two kingdoms is widely known and discussed, yet this thesis will address how the different meanings conveyed by Luther's use of terms "two kingdoms," "two regiments," and "two churches" are frequently overlooked in those discussions. This conflation even led the German church to employ this doctrine to justify its endorsement of the Nazi regime's political authority. Hence, the deliberate use of "the doctrine of the two" here preserves space for this overlooked diversity, avoiding the problematic but common understanding of Luther's "two kingdoms." This theme will be examined more thoroughly in Chapter 7.

  5. D. Stephen Long in "Protestant Social Ethics" explains this developmental tendency in Christian political thought, in The Cambridge Companion to Christian Political Theology, eds. Craig Hovey and Elizabeth Phillips (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 88-108; and See also Eric Gregory, Politics and the Order of Love: An Augustinian Ethic of Democratic Citizenship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008), 10-13, 75- 148.

  6. Liu Tongsu and Wang Yi, Guankan Zhongguo chengshi jiating jiaohui 观看中国城市家庭教会 [Observations on the Urban House Churches in China] (Taipei: Christian Arts Press, 2012), 17-36. Deuteronomy 6:9—he committed to the mission of publicisation that was emerging at that time among urban house churches. It advocated that religious practices be fully public and sought legitimate status as a religious association independent of the state-registered Protestant organisations' mandate to supervise the ideological purity of the churches. Wang first presented his view of the church's public mission as inextricably intertwined with his pre-conversion liberal-conservative political aspirations. In this early phase, his turn to Christianity bore the marks of a post-June Fourth intellectual seeking to re-anchor the shattered democratic hopes of 1989 in a religious framework capable of sustaining liberal claims to rights, law, and public reason. Christianity thus appeared less as a rupture with his prior political commitments than as a spiritual foundation upon which those commitments might be resecured. It was under these conditions that the perennial dilemma confronting pilgrims of the heavenly city resurfaced. The tension between withdrawal and engagement now took the form of a concrete challenge: whether the tether named "publicisation" could genuinely bind together the martyrdom tradition of Chinese house churches and the liberal civil rights agenda inherited from post-June Fourth activism. As this thesis will demonstrate, at least until Wang's arrest and imprisonment in 2018, his intellectual development consistently revealed his struggle with this tension. In order to do interpretive justice to the tensions and dynamism in Wang's thought, this thesis adopts a cultural-linguistic interpretative approach proposed in postliberal theology. This approach avoids treating his thought as a propositional system or as expressions of an inherent human nature, but rather as a trajectory guided primarily by the church community's worship practices. It will show how Wang's shift from the public intellectual community of conservative liberals to the house-church pastoral career turns out to be crucial for understanding his strategies of public engagement. This thesis argues that Wang's conversion and career transition ultimately signified a radical break with his earlier liberal ideological stance. This rupture stemmed essentially from his emphasis on the martyrdom tradition of traditional house churches and his absorption of diverse theological resources, including but not limited to Anabaptist and Lutheran theologies, that finally led him beyond the neo-Calvinist theologies that are ascendant among house-church Christians in China. This interpretative approach will open up new dimensions for understanding the political- theological significance of faithful disobedience as practiced by Wang and the ERCC, or even other Chinese house churches. First, it helps break through the established Kuyperian framework that currently dominates academic research on Wang's theology. Secondly, it repositions Wang's theological vision through Stanley Hauerwas's Christian apocalyptic eschatology and ecclesiology. This highlights how the communal life of worship possesses a radical critical force not only against China's totalitarian regime but also against the liberal political imagination that widely sets the grammatical rules for contemporary civic philosophical discourses. Finally, this thesis demonstrates that the Lutheran theological resources that have profoundly influenced Wang empower his public theology to maintain a profound critique of liberal politics while affirming, more so than Hauerwasians in Chinese- speaking circles, the pursuit of a genuine civil society. Ultimately, this thesis seeks to penetrate the intricate web woven from Wang's intellectual resources across different periods, thereby revealing the profound critical force underlying the practice of faithful disobedience by Wang and the ERCC. Such critical force is not merely directed against China's communist totalitarian regime, as has been widely recognised, but, more fundamentally, challenges the assumed binary opposition of "westernisation (or Americanisation) versus sinicisation" that very often frames contemporary Chinese theological discourses. Against the backdrop of the theological roots identified in this thesis, the public practice of Wang and the ERCC will be revealed as the performance of exploratory and original theological discernment. Guided by a form of life centred on the gospel, worship, and martyrdom, their theologically resistive stance—manifested through Lutheran theology within a context of persecution—shares considerable common concerns with the witness of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. This theological resistance differs from conventional critical theory in that its critical capacity fundamentally challenges all emancipatory endeavours grounded in human nature or capacity, or those that invoke God's name to endorse such natures or capacities. In other words, it extends even to doubting the very possibility of the "suspicious agency" of human beings. Simultaneously, elements inherent in Lutheran theology, such as the conceptions of hiddenness and simplicity, guide these disciples, who willingly embrace a fractured self-identity, back onto the public square to advocate for their neighbours' rights. Under the same civil society and rights advocacy, its conceptual fulcrum is no longer the liberal convictions, but rather the way of the cross—the path of disciples who willingly surrenders their life in following Christ. The term "Sino-theology" broadly encompasses all expressions of Christian theology written in Chinese. This thesis can be understood as a study of "Sino-theology" or "Chinese theology" only in the broadest sense. In Chinese academic circles, a specific, narrow usage has emerged, around which a substantial scholarly community has developed. This specific usage deliberately distinguishes Sino-theology from Chinese theology, defining the latter as an approach that, within the historical context of modern China's colonial experience, presupposes Christianity as an "alien" and "foreign" religion. Chinese theology thus carries pronounced nationalist concerns, with its fundamental premise being the agenda of "contextualisation", which demands that the foreign Christian faith must be accommondated with Chinese cultures such as Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism. Scholars of Sino-theology in the narrow sense, following Liu Xiaofeng—one of the late 20th-century representatives of "cultural Christians"—are critical of this contextualisation agenda. They strive to achieve a "paradigm shift" in theology by distinguishing themselves from the "sinicised" Chinese theology.7 They do so with the aim of liberating Christian theological research in the Chinese-speaking world from its nationalist shackles. Instead of presupposing the traditional "Chinese-Western" dichotomy, they focus their theology on the "existentialism of individual faith," emphasising the connections between "the Gospel and humanity's primal existential experience." Liu and his followers term this shift as a turn towards a "problematic of modernity."8 This thesis will employ the term "Sino-theology," when referring to specific "Sino- theological scholars." It will not do so as an affirmation of the need for a "contextualised" Chinese theology, but rather to indicate all theological discourse conducted in Chinese, or research that takes Chinese-language theology as its subject. Only in this most expansive sense can this thesis be regarded as a Sino-theological study. Yet, we will also observe how, within this broadened Sino-theological academic circle, a pervasive pressure is always exerted that Christian theology discussing the Chinese church undergoes "sinicisation." Wang's approach does overlap with Sino-theological scholars in the narrow sense of intentionally resisting this pressure. It is important, however, to be aware that neither "contextualisation" nor "individual existential problem" adequately captures the core character of Wang's theology. As this thesis will demonstrate, the profound focus9 of Wang's intellectual journey is the possibility of a credible and trustful language. This quest led him, through Lutheran theological resources, to a way that bears significant overlap with Bonhoeffer's "religionless Christianity." He rejects making God a "Deus ex machina" invoked to address human philosophical or value dilemmas. Instead he willingly embraces a fragmentised self in his encounter with God. God's presence

  7. Chin Ken Pa, "Shenme shi hanyu shenxue?" 什么是汉语神学 [What is Sino-Theology?], in Shenme shi hanyu shenxue? 什么是汉语神学 [What is Sino-Theology?], Rev. ed. (New Taipei City: Taiwan Christian Literature Council, 2017), 8.

  8. Ibid., 8-23. See also Liu Xiaofeng, Hanyu shenxue yu lishi zhexue 汉语神学与历史哲学 [Sino-Theology and Historical Philosophy] (Hong Kong: Institute of Sino-Christian Studies, 2000).

  9. I have deliberately avoided using the term "ultimate concern" here, as its usage, particularly under the influence of existentialist thinkers such as Paul Tillich, is all too easily drawn back into the philosophical context of individual existential problems. dissolves existential questions rather than answering them. This rendered his theological quest an alternative paradigm distinct from the aforementioned Sino-theology and Chinese theology. Moreover, this thesis will also clarify that rejecting contextualised theology does not imply that Wang has reverted to the old path of American liberal ideology. On the contrary, even if not sharply articulated, Wang's more mature theology has already diverged markedly from his former conservative allies. This observation dispels the widespread academic accusation that these urban house church leaders ultimately sought only to build an "American City on a Chinese Hill,"10 thereby absolving them of charges of colonialism or Western cultural chauvinism. 2. Review of the Current State of Research The English-speaking world has now accumulated a substantial if extensive body of research on Wang. Gerda Wielander stands as a pioneer who opened the field of study and sparked academic interest in it. Beginning in 2009, she published essays examining the influence of China's urban Christian intellectuals on the country's democratisation movement.11 Her 2013 work, Christian Values in Communist China,12 can be regarded as the culmination of these phased research achievements. Her research influentially established an interpretive framework for understanding the public theology of Wang and other urban house churches, grounded in the fusion of post-June Fourth intellectuals' rights defence movement and neo-Calvinism. Subsequent research, whilst occasionally offering insightful references to

  10. Bai Yucheng, "American City on a Chinese Hill: American Fundamentalism in Contemporary Chinese Christianity," PhD diss. (Duke University, 2025).

  11. Gerda Wielander, "Protestant and Online: The Case of Aiyan," The China Quarterly 197 (2009), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741009000095; "Bridging the Gap? An Investigation of Beijing Intellectual House Church Activities and Their Implications for China's Democratization," Journal of Contemporary China 18 (November 2009), 849-864.

  12. Gerda Wielander, Christian Values in Communist China (New York: Routledge, 2013). other denominational theological elements in Wang's discourses, has never efficiently challenged the dominance of the analytical framework she used to frame Wang's lifework.13 Unfortunately, the first academic monograph examining Wang and the ERCC has had a tragic fate. 14 Although the author Ma Li described it as integrating "social theories, organization behavior research, and theological analysis," employing balanced sourcing to achieve an objective and interdisciplinary study of the events of sexual ethics and schism the ERCC experienced,15 since its publication, the book has faced considerable doubts regarding its academic integrity. Criticisms include widespread issues with scholarly formatting, biased sourcing, altered interview materials, selective quoting, and forced interpretations. 16 Considering the academic ethical concerns surrounding this work, this thesis sets aside this controversial publication for further scrutiny, noting only its status as the first English monograph dedicated to the study of Wang. Distinct from the dominant research frameworks, this thesis argues that Wang Yi's later thought draws upon a wider range of theological and political resources than Calvinism alone, incorporating elements from communitarian political philosophy as well as theological

  13. See, for example, Alexander Chow, "Calvinist Public Theology in Urban China Today," International Journal of Public Theology 8/2 (2014), 158-175; Chloë Starr, "Wang Yi and the 95 Theses of the Chinese Reformed Church," Religions 7/12: 142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel7120142; and Bai Yucheng, "One Foot above Liberalism: Wang Yi's Search for Civil Society," in Christian Social Activism and Rule of Law in Chinese Societies, ed. Yang Fenggang and Chris White (Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press, 2021), 267-288.

  14. Ma Li, Religious Entrepreneurism in China's Urban House Churches: The Rise and Fall of Early Rain Reformed Presbyterian Church (New York: Routledge, 2020).

  15. Ibid., 13.

  16. See Carsten T. Vala, review of Religious Entrepreneurism in China's Urban House Churches: The Rise and Fall of Early Rain Reformed Presbyterian Church, by Ma Li, Review of Religion and Chinese Society 7/1 (2020), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1163/22143955-00701007; Naomi Thurston, review of Religious Entrepreneurism in China's Urban House Churches: The Rise and Fall of Early Rain Reformed Presbyterian Church, by Ma Li, International Bulletin of Mission Research 45/4 (October 2021), 431-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396939320968002; G. Wright Doyle, "A Missed Opportunity: The Failure of a Bold Project," review of Religious Entrepreneurism in China's Urban House Churches: The Rise and Fall of Early Rain Reformed Presbyterian Church, by Ma Li, Global China Center, 6 May 2020. https://www.globalchinacenter.org/analysis/a-missed-opportunity-the-failure-of-a-bold-project; and G.K. Deng, "Xueshu waiyi xia de weiyan songting" 学术外衣下的危言耸听 [Sensationalism in Academic Disguise], The Gospel Coalition, 15 July 2019. https://tc.tgcchinese.org/article/sensationalism-disguised-as-scholarship. For one interviewee's complaint about how the book distorted his and others' interview content, see Chiou Mu-tien, "Shenpan Wang Yi? Xueshu waiyi xia de weiyan songting" 审判王怡?学术外衣下的危言耸听 [Trial of Wang Yi? Sensationalism in Academic Disguise], Facebook, 7 January 2020, https://www.facebook.com/breath35c. traditions such as martyrdom, postliberal theology, and Lutheran theology.17 In 2022, Faithful Disobedience: Writings on Church and State from a Chinese House Church was published,18 offering English translations of a substantial body of essays, lectures, and reflections by Wang and other participants in the mission of publicisation within Chinese house churches. In contrast to the texts most often emphasised in existing scholarship—namely Wang's earlier constitutionalist writings, later rearticulated through Kuyperian categories—these materials disclose theological resources that not only widen the interpretive horizon but also place significant pressure on, and in crucial respects move beyond, the Kuyperian framework through which Wang's political resistance was initially articulated. They provide English-language access to sources that had previously remained largely unavailable, thereby enabling a fuller interpretation of the public practice of Wang and the Early Rain Covenant Church. Yet, despite the availability of these resources, existing scholarship has paid little sustained attention to their theological significance, continuing instead to rely on established liberal and neo-Calvinist frameworks. One of the central aims of this thesis is to address this lacuna. 3. Overview of the Argument The source materials available for this study of Wang fall primarily into four categories. The first category is Wang's own writings. From the early 21st century until his imprisonment in 2018, his published works spanned a wide range of genres, encompassing poetry, political commentary, film reviews, theological treatises, pastoral letters, sermons, and personal reflections on faith, amongst others. It is worth noting that Wang's own writings, particularly

  17. The terms "postliberalism" and "postliberal theology" employed in this thesis refer to the theological approach that emerged from Yale Divinity School in the 1980s, centred on narrative theology and cultural-linguistic religious theory. This clarification is offered to distinguish it from the postliberalism found in contemporary political philosophy, which critiques liberalism's individualism, universalism, and free-market beliefs, even though some overlap may exist between the two. Thanks are due to Joel Pierce for suggesting this clarification.

  18. Wang Yi et al., Faithful Disobedience: Writings on Church and State from a Chinese House Church Movement, ed. and trans. Hannah Nation and J.D. Tseng (Illinois: IVP Academic, 2022). after he became a pastor, rarely adopt rigorous academic formats. This stems not only from the diverse genres of his works but also reflects a prevailing writing tendency among rightist19 public intellectuals in China. Firstly, owing to the pervasive political pressures and censorship within academic circles, right-wing intellectuals such as Liu Xiaobo and Wang tend to bypass formal academic channels, instead relying more heavily on informal public opinion arenas, particularly the online forums that emerged in the early twenty-first century.20 Secondly, the language and formal requirements governing academia are frequently perceived by these political dissidents as crystallisations of China's cultural and ideological problems. Resisting these conventions is thus regarded as integral to their political resistance.21 This contextual feature of Chinese public discourses creates difficulties for researchers tracing the origins of ideas. Although this thesis cannot guarantee complete certainty in its conceptual genealogical work, it will endeavour to identify the upstream sources of Wang's ideas through multiple approaches within its scope, including examination of writing periods, terminology, conceptual overlaps, and descriptions by others.

  19. Although in China, the term "right-wing" is often used broadly to refer to a wider range of political dissidents— such as those labeled as rightists during the 1957 Anti-Rightist Movement and the Cultural Revolution—some of whom may actually be closer to Western socialism on the political spectrum, this article adopts a narrower definition. When this article uses the terms "rightist" or "right-wing," it refers to a group of intellectuals who consciously identify with Western liberal conservatism, typically revere John Locke and Friedrich Hayek, and embrace individual property rights and laissez-faire market economic systems, regarding them as the cornerstone of constitutional democracies.

  20. On the importance of online forums for the early twenty century Christian intellectuals' right-defence movement, see Wielander, Christian Values in Communist China, Chapter 5.

  21. For example, Liu Xiaobo explicitly stated that his refusal to use footnotes constituted a deliberate reaction against China's longstanding "academic practice of annotating classical texts" and its "obsessive citation culture." Yu Jie, Wo wuzui: Liu Xiaobo zhuan 我无罪:刘晓波传 [I Am Not Guilty: A Biography of Liu Xiaobo] (Taipei: China Times Publishing, 2012), 91. Wang, too, when discussing the importance of the rise of online opinion spaces, regarded academicisation as an obstacle to authentic language: "To date, the internet has held several major implications for China's intellectual sphere. The first is that it has definitively ended the dispute between liberalism and the New Left. In my view, this very conflict was virtual precisely because 'academisation' provided both sides with strategies and spaces for expression, while simultaneously erecting linguistic barriers. This created a rupture between us, our language, and the real world, ultimately leading to a loss of voice. As the common folk say, one ends up red-faced and unable to speak." Wang Yi, "Yuyan, zhengzhi he xinyang—'Rugu shalong' de zaixian yanjiang" 语言、政治和信仰—"如故沙龙"的在线演讲 [Language, Politics and Faith—An Online Lecture on "RGForum"], in Linghun shenchu nao ziyou 灵魂深处闹自由 [Revolution in the Depth of Soul] (Taipei: Christian Arts Press, 2012), 231-232. The second category of resources consists of secondary studies on Wang's theological thought. His essays and lectures from the period spanning 2005 to approximately the early 2010s have already attracted scholarly attention. This contributes to the aforementioned academic interpretative framework of Wang's political theology, which identifies the integration of a neo-Calvinist Christian worldview with his pre-conversion conservative constitutionalist philosophy as the central theme in Wang's theory. The third category comprises Chinese philosophy and political theory, primarily but not exclusively encompassing the Confucian classics alongside contemporary interpretations and applications. An in-depth examination of these materials fundamentally serves to construct a clear portrait of the Chinese scholar-official tradition against which Wang's resistance is radically engaged. In the contemporary context, it is particularly significant for revealing the close kinship between China's current Grand External Propaganda, which exports the "Tianxia" worldview, and the traditional Celestial Empire ideology and imperial cult. This helps illuminate the political implications of the house churches' faithful disobedience within the contemporary geopolitical landscape. The final group of texts to be engaged is composed of resources from Western theological scholarship. As previously stated, this thesis does not define itself as a standard Sino- theological study. The postliberal theological approach adopted here enables it to defend a linguistic common ground between the ERCC in the East and the Reformation theology, Anabaptist Hauerwasianism, and the Lutheran theology of the Confessing Church in the West. The affinity sustained through this common ground far exceeds that of so-called contextualised Chinese philosophical and cultural resources, or even the Western liberal legal-political philosophy often perceived as shaping Wang's political aspirations. Certainly, this does not imply that localised elements can be disregarded. However, much like the Acts' account of Pentecost, when the Holy Spirit descended, the Gospel was articulated in diverse cultural languages. Its decisive significance depends on the disciples' reception of "tongues like as fire" (Acts 2:3), a common grammatical ground that transcends the incommensurability between linguistic systems, a phenomenon now widely recognised in contemporary philosophy and sometimes regarded as a threat to the reconciliation in pluralistic societies.22 From this perspective, drawing on Western resources to clarify the fundamental grammar of Wang's public theology can yield theological insights that extend beyond the scope of cultural anthropology. It reveals how, amidst the tug-of-war between Eastern and Western philosophical and political ideologies, Wang and the ERCC establish, or at least attempt to establish, an alternative model. It aims to observe, in such tension, through eyes transformed in worship, the new things the Heavenly Father is accomplishing in His world, and to listen, with ears opened, to the wondrous symphony of creation responding to the Lord who watches over it day and night. With this certainty, martyrdom-oriented Christians can return to the world and re- establish the foundations for civil life in a fragmented society. Structurally, this thesis is divided into seven chapters. Chapter 1 delineates Wang's biographical background, identifying the collective trauma inflicted upon civil rights intellectuals by the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989 as the most significant orientational driving force in Wang's intellectual journey. Here, I reveal how the spiritual wasteland left by the massacre guided a group of post-June Fourth intellectuals to perceive the essence of social reform as the reconstruction of spiritual and religious values. Drawing upon Liu Xiaobo's recollections of the June Fourth movement, I demonstrate how a more profound and radical reflection on the legacies of nationalism and the Confucian scholar-official tradition emerged among those post-June Fourth activists. Guided by the signpost of "totalistic westernisation," this intellectual trajectory fostered an interest in Christianity. Notably, this spiritual quest

  22. For a feminist perspective on this issue, see Susan Moller Okin, Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999). unfolds centrally through aesthetic theory, particularly poetics. Here, freedom was presented primarily as a problem of philosophy of language. How to discover a new language that breaks free from China's traditional aesthetic sensibilities, historically employed to maintain social order and harmony, became the core concern of these political dissidents. Chapter 2 critically examines Wang's constitutionalist discourse. It highlights ambiguities and contradictions within Wang's early conservative legal-political theories. These issues reveal the vacuum of value pervading the spiritual world of post-June Fourth intellectuals. Thanks to Wang's reflections on his writings from this period following his conversion to Christianity, we can now discern, with hindsight, the stark dissonance and inauthenticity between the nihilistic playfulness of the poet Wang Yi and the constitutionalist Wang Yi's unreserved praise for human tradition. Wang's dramatic conversion to Christianity brought him into contact with the transcendent he had long sought, embarking him upon a protracted journey to learn the new language of Christianity. At the outset, the neo-Calvinist concept of a Christian worldview, familiar to urban house churches, helped Wang swiftly bridge the gap between his Lockean conservatism and his faith. The implicit ambiguities, nevertheless, foreshadowed the fragility of this connection and its future revision. Chapter 3 begins by reviewing the historical context of Wang's calling to full-time ministry when the urban house churches' mission of publicisation was emerging. After outlining the practical focus of publicisation on legal registration and the establishment of church buildings, this chapter draws on secondary research to highlight the dual critiques faced by evangelical house churches engaged in this mission. These polarised critiques reflect the identity tensions confronting urban house churches as they ascend. Leaders of the mission, like Wang and Liu Tongsu, employed martyrdom as the common ground they shared with separatist-leaning traditional house churches, insisting on the continuity between the two. This, however, precipitated interpretive chaos regarding the public significance of their faith practices. Some scholars express concern that these dissidents have drawn the church too close to secular politics, placing the Christian witness at risk of being reduced to a liberal political agenda; others point out that adherence to the tradition of early house churches has distanced them too far from China's cultural and social context, hindering the cause of Christian contextualisation. However, these two critical approaches ultimately converge upon anxieties surrounding the "Americanisation" of faith. Chapter 4 first examines several Western-based scholarly analyses of Wang that defend his theology from a Kuyperian perspective. However, the divergent attitudes towards the sinicisation agenda also reveal tensions among these defenders. This chapter demonstrates that this tension fundamentally stems from an internal ambiguity within Abraham Kuyper's theory, situated between theological propositionalism and experiential-expressionism. This ambiguity not only risks undermining the theoretical foundations of the ERCC's anti-sinicisation practices but also obscures the original social-critical force of ecclesiology and eschatology on which these practices are grounded. The chapter concludes with a genealogical synthesis of English scholarship on Wang's theology, revealing how the dominant Kuyperian interpretative framework overlooks several crucial turning points in Wang's intellectual trajectory. These include his later critical engagement with Lockean liberalism, his embrace of martyrdom theology, and the Lutheran theological resources that enabled his critical reflection on Calvinist theology. A reconstructed alternative interpretative framework for reading Wang's lifework commences in Chapter 5. It introduces the cultural-linguistic approach of postliberal theology and reveals its presence within Wang's later theological works. Given the long-standing bloc confrontation in modern Chinese church history between "conservative-evangelical house churches" and "liberal-universalist Three-Self Church," postliberal theology—largely born of universalist concerns—appears deeply at odds with Wang's house-church identity. Nevertheless, this chapter takes a detour. It first demonstrates through the theological transmission and transformation between George Lindbeck and Hauerwas, how postliberal theology has already transcended its initial ecumenical objectives to embrace a catholicity centred on particular locality. Furthermore, it shows how Wang's later pursuit of faith as a form of life resonates with postliberal theology's cultural-linguistic critique of propositionalism and expressionism. Finally, drawing on a postliberal, cultural-linguistic perspective, the chapter examines a concrete Kuyperian proposal for Christian sinicisation that centres on interreligious dialogue with New-Confucian philosophy. By following this proposal through to its theological implications, the chapter argues that sinicisation strategies focused primarily on academic exchange and conceptual convergence underestimate the formative role of communal Christian practices—especially worship and the sacraments—and thus rely on an unduly idealised view of interreligious reconciliation that overlooks incommensurable differences of grammar and practice. Chapter 6 addresses the tension between Wang's public theology and Hauerwasianism. Drawing upon the theological critiques of civic movements offered by Hong Kong Hauerwasians during the Occupy Central movement, it illuminates the potential conflict between the modern idea of civil society and an ecclesiology that emphasises the Christian community itself being the public and, as such, an alternative polis. To reconcile these two key elements coexisting in Wang's thought, this chapter draws in Bonhoeffer's Lutheran theology to explore the seemingly contradictory concepts of Christianity's "visibility" and "hiddenness." It partially concurs with Jonathan Malesic's critique that Hauerwas's interpretation of Bonhoeffer's testimony may have insufficiently acknowledged the latter's teaching on Christian hiddenness. However, through an in-depth analysis of Bonhoeffer's texts, this chapter also demonstrates that Malesic erroneously presupposes a strictly binary opposition between "hiddenness versus visibility (or publicity)." Instead, drawing upon perspectives offered by contemporary Lutheran theology, this chapter proposes the concept of "publicisation as hiddenness" to interpret the theological significance of the public practices of urban house churches. Accordingly, this not only re-establishes a pathway for the church toward civil society but also deepens its critical capacity, enabling it to engage with reflections on self- identity, a theme that profoundly shapes contemporary discourses on civic philosophy. Chapter 7 opens by offering Wang's educational theory as an example demonstrating the limitations of the two-kingdom or two-city theological frameworks he employs. It then proposes how the Lutheran doctrine of the three estates can better provide a supportive theological context for the public concerns of house churches, while also preserving the eschatological apocalyptic tension between God's kingdom and the world. This repaired account of the church's nature as a public provides potentially valuable resources for Wang's theological integration. Finally, this chapter concludes with a synthetic review of the thesis, outlining the breakthroughs, significance, limitations, and prospects of the interpretative approach presented. Chapter 1 Biographical Background 1. A Smelly but Thinking Flower 1.1. Post-June Fourth: The Spiritual Generations Fed by Blood and Tanks In 1989, protestors gathered in Tiananmen Square in Beijing, China. What began in April as a commemoration of Hu Yaobang, a former general secretary who was seen, or shaped, by protestors as representing the voice of liberalisation and reform within the Chinese Communist Party, had grown into a nationwide demonstration. Earlier, in a political struggle within the Party, Zhao Ziyang, who represented the same reformist faction as Hu and succeeded the former, was defeated. The return to power of the political conservatives, who advocated a hard line against the student demonstrations, meant that a bloody storm was imminent. That night, the army was ordered to clear the square. Armed with weapons and tanks, soldiers easily broke the students' meagre defences. Despite the efforts of negotiation of a few core intellectual leaders in the square that made the army agree to open a corner for the students to evacuate safely, the clashes throughout the clearing process still resulted in the deaths and injuries of many protesting citizens and students. What followed was a period of strong political control and liquidation in the 1990s that was grossly disproportionate to China's economic liberalisation. Such memories not only left physical and psychological scars on the protesting intellectuals and citizens at the time but also greatly affected the youth who had not yet been able to participate. Wang Yi was a member of the generation that grew up in the post-June Fourth atmosphere.